环球雅思学校,北京环球雅思,北京雅思学校
当前位置:中招首页 -> 外语培训 -> 职称英语 -> 复习指导 -> 
近义词判断

2007-04-08 16:49:04 来源:未知
环球雅思-中国第一雅思品牌 名师阵容
国内最大的连锁外语培训机构,被评为全国十大知名学校,连续多年荣膺中国最具影响力培训集团称号...
北京新航道学校-胡敏“中国雅思之父”
多所世界名校,可根据意愿选择留学国家与学校、国内两年、国外两年,节省大量费用与一年学习时间
北京雅思学校-刘洪波、张皓亲自授课
北雅 IELTS 培训基地是全国最早、最权威进行 IELTS 考试培训研究的专业化、正规化机构,强大的师资。
上海朗阁雅思学校-南方雅思培训首选
国内最大的雅思培训基地。拥有上百位全职中外雅思专家,25人小班授课、中外专家联合执教、保分承诺
  韩企、日企定向培养 北京理工大学校本部招生
  中国人民大学计划外 北京文理研修学院招生
 

  导读:

  1.       内容:词汇(二)

  2.       词汇:近义词判断

  TEXT

  They Need Your DNA

  Should scientists who take blood and tissue samples for research be allowed to use them for other studies without permission? Will the original donors care if they do?

  Getting the answer right is a big deal for geneticists who are beginning to link diseases to genes in the newly sequenced human genome. Respecting the wishes of blood and tissue donors is critical. Make a mess of it and we jeopardize the hunt for the next generation of treatments.

  One group of indigenous people in British Columbia is feeling particularly let down. Members of the Nuu-chah-nulth claim research was done on their blood without their consent. They are angry, and want their samples back.

  In the 1980s Nuu-chah-nulth gave permission for a researcher from the University of British Columbia to take blood samples for a study into the genetics of an unusual form of arthritis. But they claim the same samples were used again without their consent for a different study. The researcher, Ryk Ward, now at the University of Oxford, says samples are often retained for potential further research. But he promises to destroy blood serum for anyone who withdraws their consent.

  Researchers who routinely use genetic samples in their work, take note: the Nuu-chah-nulth's reaction could be a taste of things to come.

  Why? Volunteers all over the world are being asked to donate DNA for research. In some cases, the nature of the research is specified on consent forms that volunteers sign. But in others it isn't. And on the whole, researchers would prefer to avoid the hassle (持久的争论) of tracing people every time they want to use a blood sample

  In the US, guidelines drawn up by the government and the National Bioethics (生物伦理学) Advisory Commission, declare that people donating DNA for research have to be told what their sample will be used for. However, "secondary use" of genetic material is treated mostly as a privacy issue. If individuals aren't identified by the new research, they don't need to be consulted, or even informed.

  It's slightly different in Britain. The Medical Research Council and the Welcome Trust are drawing up plans to collect DNA from 500,000 people for a study linking genes and lifestyle with disease. The researchers planning the study say they will specify broad uses the DNA will be put to. But that with consent the samples may be used for other disease associations which cannot be anticipated now.

  Some volunteers will be perfectly happy with either of these approaches. They've given their DNA for research and as far as they're concerned, that's all they want to know. But others may be more troubled, particularly indigenous people, with their long history of exploitation at the hands of Europeans.

  Clearly people have the right to decide how their own genetic material will be used and it doesn't have to be a bureaucratic nightmare (恶梦). Volunteers could simply tick a box on the consent form if they want to know what their DNA is intended for. Or they could be asked to specify areas of research they don't want to be part of, such as studies on alcoholism, race, or intelligence.

  If they object, they must have the right to withdraw.

  New Words

  permission [pE5miFEn] n. 允许

  donate [dEu5neIt] vt. 捐赠,捐献

  geneticist [dVi5netIsIst] n. 遗传学家

  sequence [5si:kwEns] vt. 把按顺序排好,确定…的化学结构序列

  jeopardize [dVi5RpEdaIz] vt. 危害

  indigenous [in5dIdVInEs] adj. 生来的,土生土长的,本地的

  arthritis [B:5WraItIs] n. 关节炎

  claim [5kleIm] vt. n. 声称,需要

  retain [ri5teIn] vt. 保留,保存

  potential [pE5tenFEl] adj. 可能的,潜在的

  serum [sIErEm] n. 血清

  withdraw [wiT5drR:] vt. 收回,撤消

  specify [5spesIfaI] vt. 详细说明

  prefer [prI5fE:] vt. 更喜欢,宁愿

  trace [treIs] vt. 跟踪

  guideline [5gaIdlaIn] n. 纲要,指南

  draw [drR:] vt. 制订,开立

  consult [5kEn5sQlt] vt. 向咨询,请教

  exploit [ik5splRit] vt. 开发,利用

  bureaucratic [7bjUErE5krAtIk] adj.官僚主义的

  intend [in5tend] vt. 想要,意思是

  object [Eb5dVekt] vi. 反对,不赞成

  Notes: the Nuu-chah-nulth  原名为Coast District of Indian Chiefs

  应试指导

  I. 近/同义词(见补充材料)

  II. 词义辨析实例

  1.       形异义近

  要点:形不同,义相近,应区分搭配,洞悉其用法及差别

  例:Salvery fade in America in the 19th century.

  A. vanished      B. disappeared C. accomplished        D. abolished

  2.       形似义异

  要点:源自同一词源,前缀、后缀、或词根相同,词义不同。避免被外形蒙蔽。

  例:An increasing proportion of our population, unable to live without advanced medical interference, will become progressively more reliant on expensive technology.

  A. interference  B. interruption   C. intervention interaction

  3.       形异义异

  要点:形、义皆不同。可采用排除法或上下文语境猜测题意。

  例:Corporations and labor unions have given great benefits upon their employees and members as well as upon the general public.

  A. conferred     B. granted        C. flung D. submitted

  4.       短语成语

  要点:加强记忆,善于归纳。

  例:

  1)  As a way of dealing with the mails while they were away, the Johnsons asked the cleaning lady to send little printed slips asking the senders to write again later.

  A. picking up     B. coping with  C. passing out    D. getting across

  2)  First editions of certain popular book cannot be obtained for love or money.

  A. at any place B. at any price C. in any language       D. in any country

  Exercises

  I. 根据课文内容在下例选项中选择一个正确答案,并给相应字母打√。

  1. The two questions raised at the beginning of the passage

  A. reflect the blood and tissue donors' concerns over genetic diseases.

  B. refer to the donors' right to know what their samples are used for.

  C. suggest the significance of genetic research for human beings.

  D. imply a wrong track genetic research is in.

  2.       What happened to the members of Nuu-chah-nulth'?

  A.      They were coxed into offering their blood samples.

  B.      They were deprived of their informed consent.

  C.      They were forced to withdraw their consent.

  D.     D. All of the above.

  3.       What happened in British Columbia, according to geneticists who routinely need genetic material,

  A. happens all over the world.        B. was beyond expectation.

  C. can be expected.                     D. was ridiculous.

  4.       In which of the following is the US different from Britain concerning the use of genetic material'?

  A. Bioethical guidelines.                    B. The scale of genetic research.

  C. Permission for secondary use.        D. Collecting samples with consent.

  5.       Some volunteers will be perfectly happy with either of these approaches, which

  A.      means not everybody can be an eligible volunteer for genetic research.

  B.      means not all volunteers have the right to withdraw their consent.

  C.      does not mean we can deprive donors' right to informed consent.

  D.     means we can simply omit the consent form.

   关键词  >>外语培训 >>职称英语
 
四级考试
BEC 四六级新托福
北京雅思学校
北京雅思学校
北京环球雅思学校
北京环球雅思学校
北京新航道学校
新航道学校秋季课程
李阳疯狂英语学校
李阳疯狂英语学校
上海环球雅思学校
上海环球雅思学校

  ■ 最新推荐课程

 ·新航道雅思高中生5.5保分班  ·雅思中学生半年脱产班保6分  ·北京雅思高中生5.5分保分班
 ·新航道雅思6分慢速精讲保分班  ·环球雅思中学生6段式保6分班  ·北京雅思基础6分保分培训班
 ·新航道雅思6.5慢速精讲保分班  ·环球雅思6.5高分保分培训班  ·北京雅思6.5高分保分培训班
相关文章
 ·专家建议职称英语备考诀窍
 ·专家解析职称英语考试阅读理解
 ·有关职称英语考试的三点建议
 ·如何通过专业技术职称英语考试
 ·职称英语考试语法详解:倒装句型
论坛热贴
 【发表评论】
 昵称:
 内容:
 
 【最新评论】 更多...
中招在线版权与免责声明:
① 凡本站注明“稿件来源:中招在线”的所有文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属本网所有,任何媒体、网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式复制发表。已经本站协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载使用时必须注明"稿件来源:中招在线",违者本站将依法追究责任。
② 本站注明稿件来源为其他媒体的文/图等稿件均为转载稿,本站转载出于非商业性的教育和科研之目的,并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。如转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者在两周内速来电或来函联系。
热点聚焦
  环球雅思半年脱产班  
英语实用信息
本周院校排行榜
最新资源排行榜
 
关于中招 - 广告服务 - 网站建设 - 版权声明 - 联系我们 - 英才加盟 - 网站地图 - 友情链接 - 免责声明 - 设为首页
Copyright @ 2005-2008 zhongzhao.com All Rights Reserved.
中招在线 版权所有